|
Dilbert mash up: July 18th 2008 by Denis Hancock on Jul 18, 2008 - 07:33 AM read 457 times
Source: http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=1745 |
|

As always, you’re invited to throw your hat into the ring and make your own at dilbert.com.
-
By: Rob
a reply to Dilbert mash up: July 18th 2008
by Rob on Jul 18, 2008 - 08:40 AM read 40 times
Source: http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=1745#comment-151568
A little constructive criticism? Yesterday, I got 8 posts from your feed. Almost every day I get more than one. And that’s fine because most of it is relevant to my interests and high quality (which is why I’m subscribed, of course). But Dilbert mash-ups? Not so much. Consider your audience - probably getting a lot of techno-babble/noise from a lot of different sources. Do you really want Dilbert in there fighting for attention? Cause I don’t really want to give it to him, so it’s a distraction. And, honestly, I am more likely to unsubscribe from feeds that have lots of posts per day if there are regularly posts that have nothing to do with why I subscribed in the first place. Just my 2 cents. Otherwise, great stuff here! Thanks.
-
By: Denis Hancock
a reply to Dilbert mash up: July 18th 2008
by Denis Hancock on Jul 19, 2008 - 06:34 PM read 39 times
Source: http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=1745#comment-152062
Thanks for the comment Rob - it seems some people like them, and some people don’t. Maybe I’ll take them off to a seperate page that doesn’t go into the feed… should be an acceptable comprimise.
-
By: Wikinomics Blog Archive Dilbert Mashup re-direct: July 21st 2008
a reply to Dilbert mash up: July 18th 2008
by Wikinomics Blog Archive Dilbert Mashup re-direct: July 21st 2008 on Jul 21, 2008 - 09:14 PM read 35 times
Source: http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=1745#comment-153222
[...] has no sense of humour and spoiled the fun for the rest of us made an interesting comment on the July 18th mashup. In short, he found the Dilbert mashup to be a distraction not worthy of his attention, and [...]
on Jul 18, 2008 - 07:33 AM read 457 times

