Thank you - I’ve not seen these groupings laid out this way before, but it makes sense and is a very helpful way of depicting it. I’ll be following this with interest.

Very interesting … do you see the “mass collaboration” circle as including “consumer participants” or would these folks create a comprise a separate circle? I would see this circle as overlapping digital marketing and social media.

Glad to see you have RSS in the Enterprise 2.0 part :-), but there are probably a few more tools that support SLATES that could be thrown in there too - e.g. search, tagging etc (which might actually overlap with mass collaboration). The other player you might like to add into the background is around information and even records management.

Susan,

I think you should split out “Enterprise 2.0″ into its internal and external components. Forrester calls these “Enterprise 2.0″ and “Social Computing” respectively, and puts them both under one “Enterprise Web 2.0″ heading.

Niall

[...] Susan and I have been working on articulating how the different worlds of “2.0″ fit toge…, or don’t, from the point of view of the enterprise. [...]

[...] 9, 2008 by carlhaggerty I was reading a blog post by Susan Scrupski about circles of expertise in 2.0 for eBiz. It hit a chord for me as i have been thinking a lot [...]

Hey Susan, Nice breakdown. I’ve been working with Visible Technologies lately so I guess I’m now in the Social Media circle of things. Hope all is well in Austin.
Keep in Touch,
Mike

What a great visual. The one domain I’d like to see represented concerns the fact that an organization (or people) practicing “Information-Sharing 2.0″ should do so under some measure of information governance, i.e., underneath the activity domains and solutions illustrated, there’s a consistent need to manage the information and data (consumed or produced) according to a governance model that makes sense to your context. You may need to observe legal, policy, procedure, standards or simply effective business controls to make sure the information you’re stewarding (i.e. “enterprise assets”) is used most effectively and appropriately (and can be measured as such). Enterprise Content Management disciplines applied to the Information-Sharing 2.0 paradigm.

[...] no means are we saying that this is complete, it is just a start. We need your help. Head over to Susan’s blog to find out how you can [...]

the amusing irony is that the fragmentation that you see is the result of the same kind of mind that is wishing to categorize it all! seeing differences, rather than seeing wholeness. makes me smile

[...] no means are we saying that this is complete, it is just a start. We need your help. Head over to Susan’s blog to find out how you can [...]

What a great visual. The one domain I’d like to see represented concerns the fact that an organization (or people) practicing “Information-Sharing 2.0″ should do so under some measure of information governance, i.e., underneath the activity domains and solutions illustrated, there’s a consistent need to manage the information and data (consumed or produced) according to a governance model that makes sense to your context. You may need to observe legal, policy, procedure, standards or simply effective business controls to make sure the information you’re stewarding (i.e. “enterprise assets”) is used most effectively and appropriately (and can be measured as such). Enterprise Content Management disciplines applied to the Information-Sharing 2.0 paradigm.

Hey Susan, Nice breakdown. I’ve been working with Visible Technologies lately so I guess I’m now in the Social Media circle of things. Hope all is well in Austin.
Keep in Touch,
Mike

[...] 9, 2008 by carlhaggerty I was reading a blog post by Susan Scrupski about circles of expertise in 2.0 for eBiz. It hit a chord for me as i have been thinking a lot [...]

[...] Susan and I have been working on articulating how the different worlds of “2.0″ fit toge…, or don’t, from the point of view of the enterprise. [...]

Susan,

I think you should split out “Enterprise 2.0″ into its internal and external components. Forrester calls these “Enterprise 2.0″ and “Social Computing” respectively, and puts them both under one “Enterprise Web 2.0″ heading.

Niall

Very interesting … do you see the “mass collaboration” circle as including “consumer participants” or would these folks create a comprise a separate circle? I would see this circle as overlapping digital marketing and social media.

Glad to see you have RSS in the Enterprise 2.0 part :-), but there are probably a few more tools that support SLATES that could be thrown in there too - e.g. search, tagging etc (which might actually overlap with mass collaboration). The other player you might like to add into the background is around information and even records management.

Thank you - I’ve not seen these groupings laid out this way before, but it makes sense and is a very helpful way of depicting it. I’ll be following this with interest.