|
|
Web 2.0 and the Other Side of Blogging by Vaughan Merlyn on Jul 02, 2008 - 12:56 PM read 322 times Source: http://itorganization2017.wordpress.com/?p=271 |
|
I had a client experience the other day that got me thinking about IT professionals, Web 2.0 and the not-so-simple act of “keeping up” with today’s incredible pace of technology change.
I was in an IT meeting with abouteighteenIT managers. It was my first meeting with this group. I noted that EVERY one of them brought laptop computers with them, opened them, and started working on them. I commented on the somewhat unusual sight, and one of them said, “This is part of our ‘green’ initiative - saves paper!”
At the end of the meeting, I asked again about the laptops, and someone confessed, “The reality is, I get 300 company emails a day. I have to keep up with them or I’ll have an unthinkable backlog, and work will stop because many of these message are from people who need my response in order to do their work.” I appreciated her honesty, and was not offended - they’d all dropped into their keyboarding activities from the very start of the meeting, and seemed to do a good job of being engaged in the meeting, while keeping up with their email.
However, as I left the meeting, I worried about how these IT professionalskeep up with changing technologies and important trends when their days seems to consist mostly of keeping up with emails. I probed around this question with a sample from the group and got a consistent answer that they really have a hard time doing this, while striking a reasonable work/life balance. Keeping up with 300+ emails is a real inhibitor to growth and learning!
So, what’s this got to do with Web 2.0 and blogging? At least a couple of things:
- Based on my personal experience, validated by conversations with other companies who have moved to social networking tools (see, for example, this NY Times article on IBM) it is possible to move much of the daily corporate messaging load to collaboration tools and Instant Messaging, thereby spending significantly less time fighting the in-box monster.
- When I started blogging, I realized that in order to be well informed and able to engage in important global conversations about our profession, I HAD to invest time in reading more - especially, selected parts of the blogosphere. This increased my Web 2.0 literacy as I had to use web readers, RSS feeds and the like. It also tapped me into an incredibly rich source of timely information. Yes, there’s a lot of self-promoting, mind-numbing rubbish out there - but you, as the reader, get to select which blogs you will check in on. And those typically point you to other interesting conversations as they surface.
The lesson - if you are drowning in email, take charge, get back in control, and make sure each and every day has some “white space” for your personal developmental needs. You owe that to your employer, and to yourself. Don’t be one of those victims who wear their email burden like a “badge of courage”!
-
By: itorganization2017
a reply to Web 2.0 and the Other Side of Blogging
by itorganization2017 on Jul 02, 2008 - 04:03 PM read 78 times
Source: http://itorganization2017.wordpress.com/?p=271#comment-307
Great response, as ever, Bob - thanks. The logging of messages, however, may be a very real issue. It’s something we are exploring in our Redefining Employee Computing multi-company research. Some companies (who have had to put up with more litigation than they’d like) have their legal people all over them to find a way to log IM messages, or hold off on IM till they have found a way.
-
By: Bob Landstrom
a reply to Web 2.0 and the Other Side of Blogging
by Bob Landstrom on Jul 02, 2008 - 03:54 PM read 38 times
Source: http://itorganization2017.wordpress.com/?p=271#comment-306
I have a post on my blog about what happened when I sent out a cyber-survey asking if email was dead (I happen to think it is, or at least should be euthanized).
The feedback I got was surprising to me. A large percentage of the respondents thought I must be crazy. These people could not imagine life without email. To me though, this is more a mindset locked into email as an application in spite of it’s limitations, rather than something that might facilitate a richer and more fluid communication (as many Web2.0 technologies do).
I’ve tried on several occasions to promote the use of IM, chat, et. al. instead of email. Some individuals are comfortable with the switch and lots of email messages were hence replaced by spontaneous chat dialogues. Others though, resisted even the idea of trying a different form of communication.
I will tell you that those in this latter category were concerned that without email as a written record of the conversation they would not be able to hold people accountable. These are the same people who sacrifice 500K of storage space for a one-word message (e.g., “thanks,” “ok”, “no”
by email, copied to three or four people. It’s interesting in my own efforts in this regard to observe management priorities when it comes to topics like this. If their is a dogmatic and controlling management mindset (e.g. verifying who did what and how much), then there’s probably less interest in the value of collaboration. This category of mindset is going to be a resistor of Web2.0 technologies. If the management style leverages trust and an assumption of very capable resources, then collaboration is likely recognized as an accelerator.
The other interesting point about your experience is that your audience felt that if they didn’t answer their emails then other people couldn’t do there job. This may make perfect sense if I knew the business and the situation you were involved in. However, one has to wonder if there are seriously impaired work flow processes in such an organization.
For the record, there are many emails I don’t bother to answer and even some that I don’t bother to read…. simply because they’re unnecessary due to their nature. I can’t afford to be a hostage to my inbox.
Bob

