|
|
re: Privacy 2.0
 a reply to Privacy 2.0by Brittain on Apr 07, 2008 - 12:30 PM read 64 times |
A few thoughts:
I agree this case is 99% likely about the money. Doesn't make them wrong though. My question: if this was a private road, did someone trespass? We still have a Constitution that still protects our individual liberties and, I'm quite sure, you can't break the law while infringing on someone's (by coming onto their property and taking a picture, for example).
As to your bigger point, I also agree that information sharing as you describe it seems fairly inevitable. That doesn't make it right. When Hitler rolled tanks into France, that outcome seemed inevitable also ... until the world got together to set things right.
Featured
Author Profile
Subscribe
Feed for nGenera Community:
Public
Secure
Why subscribe? What is RSS?