|
|
Privacy 2.0 by Katie Carty Tierney on Apr 07, 2008 - 11:32 AM read 3498 times Source: http://txaggie94.wordpress.com/?p=43 |
|
You knew it was bound to happen. You just knew it. As cool as Google Street View is, it had to cross the line somewhere. Somewhere appears to be Pittsburgh.
Short story shorter: Couples house appears on Street View. Couple lives on a private road. Couple is angry. Couple claims invasion of privacy. Couple sues Google for a sum greater than $25,000.
Guess what? This aint your mamas privacy anymore.
Since the late 90s, the information available on the internet has exploded beyond what Al Gore and the ARPANET creators could have even imagined. You can look up pretty much anyone or anything, and get your answer. The availability of data is expanding as we move to mobile and wireless connectivity to digital information. Pew Research reported last month that 62% of all American adults have taken advantage of mobile internet connectivity. Information is everywhere, and its accessible from anywhere.
When I do a search for my name on Google, I come up with 768,000 results. Some of those are about me, and some arent. If I wanted to dig a little deeper, I would be able to find where I live, what I do for fun, and how often Ive irritated people in my town with calls for Homeowners Association Fiscal Responsibility. Luckily, theres no Street view of my house, yet, but I know its coming. And, being the digital native that my boss calls me, Ill just have to accept it. The worms are out of the can, my friends. We cant put them back, but we can learn to live with them.
That brings me to my main point. In a connected culture, we have to redefine our own expectations of privacy. Let’s call it Privacy 2.0, just for fun.
Its no longer reasonable to assume that people wont be able to easily find out where you live or what your house is worth. Its not reasonable to assume that if you get loaded at an underage drinking party, pictures of you wont show up on Facebook. Its not reasonable to assume that anything you do outside the 4 walls of your own home wont be captured, recorded, and added to the ever-growing base of human knowledge. Dont expect that your private life is anything near what you used to think of as private. It simply isnt.
So, where does that leave you? Youve got to understand that now, more than ever, you have to accept responsibility for your actions, and make sure that youre acting in a manner that portrays the image you want to portray. Youve also got to be more diligent about your own security and safety. If that means installing a security system or more locks, do it. You must realize that people are going to know more about you than you might want. People will form impressions of you based on what they find on-line, and first impressions always matter.
Back to our friends from Pittsburgh My (personal, non-BSG-Alliance) opinion is that theyre just looking for a quick buck. Their home is pictured, along with drawings of the rooms, on the Allegheny County website. Until they sue the county, I cant really believe its about anything more than money.
-
re: Privacy 2.0
a reply to Privacy 2.0
by Brittain on Apr 07, 2008 - 12:30 PM read 43 timesA few thoughts:
I agree this case is 99% likely about the money. Doesn't make them wrong though. My question: if this was a private road, did someone trespass? We still have a Constitution that still protects our individual liberties and, I'm quite sure, you can't break the law while infringing on someone's (by coming onto their property and taking a picture, for example).
As to your bigger point, I also agree that information sharing as you describe it seems fairly inevitable. That doesn't make it right. When Hitler rolled tanks into France, that outcome seemed inevitable also ... until the world got together to set things right.
-
By: txaggie94
a reply to Privacy 2.0
by txaggie94 on Apr 07, 2008 - 01:37 PM read 72 times
Source: http://txaggie94.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-612
Hey, Scott… Thanks for the thoughts.
1. I’m not saying Google didn’t have people trespassing. They probably did. But that’s a criminal matter, not a civil one, and certainly not one worth in excess of $25K. And we don’t know that they didn’t have the permission of another homeowner to be on the road, either.
2. What types of things could we do to reverse the trend on privacy? Could we work together to encourage local governments to take down red-light cameras, security cameras, etc.? Could we work with Google to implement a policy where no personal information is posted without the explicit permission of the person named? I don’t see any viable solutions, so I am interested in what other people see.Thanks, again, Scott. As usual, your comments are thought-provoking.
-Katie -
By: rikez
a reply to Privacy 2.0
by rikez on Apr 08, 2008 - 01:23 PM read 77 times
Source: http://txaggie94.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-615
in the future, i think technology can’t give us a privacy?
-
By: intuitivelyobvious
a reply to Privacy 2.0
by intuitivelyobvious on Apr 08, 2008 - 06:41 PM read 72 times
Source: http://txaggie94.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-616
Thanks to technology, privacy is a thing of the past. I agree, it started with government information being public…the internet just made it easier to find.
-
By: bVisual
a reply to Privacy 2.0
by bVisual on May 12, 2008 - 12:25 PM read 51 times
Source: http://txaggie94.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-625
I believe that with the technology that exists these days, if anyone has any expectation of privacy they need to wake up. It is scary to think of the things people can learn about you on the internet. There is no guarantee that your private life is private any more. Sad.
“When you can’t be there, bVisual.”
-
By: Alan
a reply to Privacy 2.0
by Alan on May 30, 2008 - 01:53 PM read 46 times
Source: http://txaggie94.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-628
Also, in looking at the path the vehicle too, it doesn’t look obvious that it’s a private road either, I can imagine driving there myself by accident, and once they did discover the private road, it doesn’t look easy to turn around either. Let those who have never taken a wrong turn (and had to turn around in someone’s driveway as a result) cast the first stone.
-
By: Alan
a reply to Privacy 2.0
by Alan on May 30, 2008 - 01:49 PM read 60 times
Source: http://txaggie94.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-627
If there’s a no trespassing sign, it’s not very visible. You can go to google maps and once in “street view” follow the trail of the vehicle yourself or click on the map toward the end of the lane:
http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=1567+Oakridge+Lane,+Pittsburgh,+PA&sll=40.578368,-80.079131&sspn=0.006617,0.015299&layer=c&ie=UTF8&cbll=40.575645,-80.079953&panoid=7IfICTbmbepjemD120VPfw&ll=40.578971,-80.079217&spn=0.006617,0.015299&z=16&cbp=1,390.19,,0,5
,



