|
Web and Enterprise 2.0 - Technology or paradigm (Part 2)
by Anonymous User on Jul 28, 2007 - 05:11 PM read 3557 times |
|
I have been back from vacation for over a week and still trying to catch up with the many things that I placed on-hold during that time. Finally the time slice goes to finishing the second part of the “web and Enterprise 2.0 technology or paradigm” posting.
To refresh your memory, in part 1 I discussed the two forces in the Web 2.0 space, the paradigm and the technology. As I continue to explore more on the potential use of web 2.0 in the enterprise it becomes obvious that these two should be identified as two different forces because these must be managed separately if you map these to an organization’s Enterprise Architecture.
So, when it comes to the Enterprise 2.0, the term has been defined as the adoption of Web 2.0 in the enterprise. The adoption of what? The paradigm and stylesI would say. Enterprise 2.0 is the result of the collaborative paradigm shift. It is the creation and adoption of the architecture of participation.
On the technology front, Enterprise Web 2.0 is the convergence of technology with legacy systems in the Enterprise. The goal is to create an architecture of partition.
The Enterprise Web 2.0 solutions provide a level of robustness that is not available in the plain Web 2.0 technology enables. Many of these EW2.0 tools actually build on top of web 2.0 technology approaches such as AJAX and mashups. But they add real business value to the enterprise. For example the mashup that the public is familiar with is the typical HTML mashup. Hundreds of mashups are created every day that bring information from multiple sources and “mash it up” on top of google maps or MS Virtual Earth. Although I see some of these adding some value to the enterprise, the real value is realized when we can provide a platform for users and developers to create, deploy and manage mashup services as reusable components and compose new applications by aggregating new data sources and existing mashup components. In the context of the enterprise we have Line of Business applications, Business Intelligence sources, real time feeds, ERP systems, departmental applications, document management solutions, and many other potential sources of information. Some of these Enterprise Web 2.0 solutions companies are providing the platform to manage innovation via mashup servers.
Some of the players in the EW2.0 area are Active Grid, Nexaweb, Laszlo and JackBe to mention a few.
Another example of Enterprise 2.0 enabled via Enterprise Web 2.0 technologies are convergence portals. With hundreds of options out there for enterprise messaging, voice, data, collaboration, etc… we end up with a very disparate set of tools that provide a fractured collaboration strategy. There is not a single place where you can manage and customize your communications and collaboration. Many vendors are catching on to this. ISPs are starting to provide a rich user interface to their users to allow them to organize the information they care to read. Many of these are built on webtop like products that provide a great framework for rich internet applications and even nicer user experience.
As I continue to explore many of the elements in Web 2.0 I will continue posting about how I can see these being used in the enterprise. I just signed up with my own account for technorati, del.icio.us and twitter. I will be looking at how social tagging and micro-blogging can be used in a work environment. So far what I can tell you in twitter is that it all depends on the content and integration. I am also kicking the tires on some of these APIs and their REST style services. Look for future postings on these.
-
By: Tony Gonzalez
a reply to Web and Enterprise 2.0 - Technology or paradigm (Part 2)
by Anonymous User on Jul 31, 2007 - 01:46 PM read 276 times
Chris,
right on!
I think that mashups is one of the Web 2.0 technologies that will be adopted in the enterprise. Like I said, the HTML mashup (maps, flickr, twitter, etc…) is flashy and there are tons of applications for the massess, but when it comes to the enterprise, well, it is a different ecosystem. I have been following the work that you guys are doing over at JackBe and like the concept of the user-driven enterprise mashup. It is good, really good to see companies looking to evolve the concepts and provide useful applications for real companies.
Tony G!
-
By: Chris Warner
a reply to Web and Enterprise 2.0 - Technology or paradigm (Part 2)
by Chris Warner on Jul 31, 2007 - 01:20 PM read 311 times
Source: http://tonygonzalez.wordpress.com/2007/07/28/web-and-ente...
Tony,
As a developer of enterprise mashup software, JackBe (http://www.jackbe.com) certainly agrees with your comment that the real value is realized when we can provide a platform for users and developers to create, deploy and manage mashup services as reusable components and compose new applications by aggregating new data sources and existing mashup components. In our work with mashups in the enterprise, we’ve defined five characteristics for true enterprise mashups that are critical to reaching this goal: 1) user-driven micro-orchestrations, 2) user-focused, 3) ad-hoc, 4) they can be visual or non-visual and 5) they can be performed on the client-side or on the server. (The complete post, ‘Defining Mashups’, can be found at http://blogs.jackbe.com/2007/07/defining-mashups.html.) We’re excited to see that these topics are finally getting the attention they deserve! Mash on.
Chris
-
By: Tony Gonzalez
a reply to Web and Enterprise 2.0 - Technology or paradigm (Part 2)
by Anonymous User on Jul 31, 2007 - 08:25 AM read 282 times
Julia,
I am glad to see that the collective intelligence is the focus of Cogenz. Companies like Cogenz will evolve the existing Web 2.0 concepts and technologies and provide enhanced solutions that realize the vision of Enterprise 2.0.
-
By: Julia Grinham
a reply to Web and Enterprise 2.0 - Technology or paradigm (Part 2)
by Julia Grinham on Jul 31, 2007 - 02:44 AM read 295 times
Source: http://tonygonzalez.wordpress.com/2007/07/28/web-and-ente...
Hi Tony - great post, look forward to hearing more in future issues!
I noticed at the end of your article you mentioned that you’ll be signing up for del.icio.us to consider how social bookmarking might be used within the enterprise. If you’re not already familiar with Cogenz, I’d definately encourage you to take a look (www.cogenz.com). We provide a social bookmarking service specifically for businesses, and have a couple of good case studies and a whole load of clients trying out the service. Businesses are finding social bookmarking easy to implement, and are reaping instant benefits in terms of ease of saving and sharing bookmarks, and connecting to colleagues with similar interests.
Hopefully you should be able to find out most things you’d want to know about Cogenz just by browsing the corporate website, but if you’d like to find out more please feel free to drop me a line.
All the best
Julia
-
By: Technology Technology July 28, 2007 6:31 pm
a reply to Web and Enterprise 2.0 - Technology or paradigm (Part 2)
by Technology ยป Technology July 28, 2007 6:31 pm on Aug 02, 2007 - 02:16 AM read 324 times
Source: http://tonygonzalez.wordpress.com/2007/07/28/web-and-ente...
[…] Web and Enterprise 2.0 - Technology or paradigm (Part 2) To refresh your memory, in part 1 I discussed the two forces in the Web 2.0 space, the paradigm and the technology. As I continue to explore more on the potential use of web 2.0 in the enterprise it becomes obvious that these two should … […]
-
2.0-ing the enterprise
a reply to Web and Enterprise 2.0 - Technology or paradigm (Part 2)
by CKeene
on Aug 21, 2007 - 05:56 PM read 154 times
You are raising a good point - how exactly does the explosion of collaboration we see on the Internet translate to the applications we work with on the IntrAnet?
The development world has long had very specific ideas about how to make business application development more collaborative. These ideas have turned into development processes like RAD, Agile and Extreme Programming.
Yet the weak link for these processes have always been on the tools side. One hope is that Web 2.0 tools will help democratize the web development process in general and more specifically allow companies to build iterative prototypes of applications.
Yes, tools like ActiveGrid will be important. But the collaborative processes that those tools allow will be the real driver of benefit. For more in this vein, look at my www.keeneview.com blog here.
-
Collaborative Development
a reply to 2.0-ing the enterprise
in a conversation thread started here
by Anonymous User on Aug 29, 2007 - 10:29 PM read 146 timesThanks for chiming in Chris.
You are absolutely right.
I expect some vendors to pick up the slack or for architects to promote the creation of reusable tools/utilities that will foster collaboration specifically for the development of applications/services. Agile methodologies are well suited for any size of development but when we meet constantly, and there are changes to be captured, and decisions are made, we run the risk of loosing valuable information if we don't have these tools and processes in place.
Tony
-

,


